• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RI Personal Injury Attorney


call 401-437-1100 for a free case consultation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • News
You are here: Home / Slip and Fall / HABERSHAW: No Evidence of a Hazardous Condition Causing Accident

By David

HABERSHAW: No Evidence of a Hazardous Condition Causing Accident

Spread the love
hazardous-condition-accident
Hazardous condition

Below you will find a significant Rhode Island Supreme Court  decision concerning an accident that occurred in Cumberland, RI. This case note is provided by an East Providence Injury Attorney.

(editors notes: some people say bad facts make bad law. In this Rhode Island premises liability case it does not appear that there was ever a valid personal injury claim worth pursuing to a full trial on the merits.)

Slip and fall resulting in injury

“An ill-fated late afternoon shopping trip to Michaels store in Smithfield led to a fall that resulted in injury to plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that while placing items she was about to purchase onto the cashier’s counter, her left foot slipped out from under her and she fell to the floor, landing on her left side. After the accident, plaintiff surveyed her surroundings and noticed what she described as a “shiny floor.” The plaintiff experienced immediate pain in her left shoulder, hip, and foot, and emergency personnel brought her to Miriam Hospital by rescue. The plaintiff claimed that as a result of her injuries, she incurred significant medical expenses and suffered physical and emotional trauma.” HABERSHAW v. MICHAELS STORES, INC. 42 A.3d 1273 (2012)

Is a slippery substance required to win a slip claim?

“This case presents us with the question of whether an allegation that a floor was shiny, standing alone, can withstand a challenge to a claim that a plaintiff was injured as a result of a dangerous condition.” Id. ” ….plaintiff alleged that the floor was “shiny,” she admitted that she did not see any slippery substances in or around the area where she fell or, for that matter, anywhere else in the store.”Id.   (David Slepkow’s contact form)  (Rhode Island Personal Injury & Accident Attorney Settlement Negotiation Tenets)

Hazardous condition required to win a premises liability case

In Habershaw the Rhode Island Supreme Court decided,  “there was a complete absence of any evidence upon which the defendant’s negligence could be established.” Id. The Court reasoned: The plaintiff did not testify that her fall was occasioned by any foreign substance on the floor, or that polish or wax had been negligently applied to the floor by defendant. The plaintiff has failed to produce any evidence that would give rise to a reasonable inference that a hazardous condition, created by defendant, existed.” Id.

“The allegation that the floor was shiny, without more, was not “competent evidence” of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s allegation is nothing more than “conjecture or speculation.” Santiago v. First Student, Inc., 839 A.2d 550, 552 (R.I.2004) (quoting Skaling v. Aetna Insurance Co., 742 A.2d 282, 288 (R.I.1999)). We reiterate that “the mere occurrence of an accident, without more, does not warrant an inference that a defendant has been negligent.” Id. (quoting Hernandez v. Fernandez, 697 A.2d 1101, 1103 (R.I.1997)).”

Obligations to exercise reasonable care to visitors

“It also is well settled in our jurisprudence that there is an affirmative duty on owners and possessors of property: “to exercise reasonable care for the safety of persons reasonably expected to be on the premises * * * includ[ing] an obligation to protect against the risks of a dangerous condition existing on the premises, provided the landowner knows of, or by the exercise of reasonable care would have discovered, the dangerous condition.” Kurczy v. St. Joseph Veterans Association, Inc., 820 A.2d 929, 935 (R.I.2003) (quoting Tancrelle v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., 756 A.2d 744, 752 (R.I. 2000)); accord Mead v. Papa Razzi Restaurant, 840 A.2d 1103, 1107 (R.I.2004).” Id.

An unsafe condition that the defendant knew or should have known about is needed

“Although a business invitor is not a guarantor of the safety of those who might be expected on the property, a duty remains to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition for prospective business invitees. Terry v. Central Auto Radiators, Inc., 732 A.2d 713, 716 (R.I.1999).” Id. “To recover in a slip-and-fall action such as the case before us here, a plaintiff “must present evidence of an unsafe condition on the premises of which the defendant was aware or should have been aware, and that the condition existed for a long enough time so the owner of the premises should have taken steps to correct [it].” Bromaghim v. Furney, 808 A.2d 615, 617 (R.I.2002) (citing Barone v. Christmas Tree Shop, 767 A.2d 66, 68 (R.I. 2001)).”

Filed Under: Slip and Fall

Primary Sidebar


call 401-437-1100 for a free case consultation
Don't Settle Low, Call David Slepkow

About Attorney David Slepkow

  • Owner & Partner at Slepkow Law Firm, one of the oldest law firms in RI - Established in 1932
  • Admitted to United States Supreme Court Bar
  • Licensed to practice in Rhode Island & Massachusetts
  • Experience at RI Supreme Court
  • 17 years of experience
  • AVVO Superb Rated 10/10
  • Speak directly with a real attorney - 24/7 - David’s Cell number 401-439-8372

Contact David Slepkow

Injury Attorney David Slepkow
1481 Wampanoag Trail Suite 1
East Providence, RI, 02915
(401) 437-1100

RI Injury Areas of Practice

  • Insured & Uninsured Motorists
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Car Accidents
  • Truck Accidents
  • Pedestrian Accidents
  • Dog Bite Injuries
  • Wrongful Death
  • Work Injuries
  • Dangerous Drugs
  • Defective Medical Devices
  • Medical Malpractice

Footer

Our Offices

RI Personal Injury Lawyer David Slepkow
589 Atwells Ave # 3C
Providence, RI, 02909
Google +
10-best-award-pi-2016
Lawyer David Slepkow | Top Attorney Personal Injury
toplawyerslepkow
avvo
cropped-wwcertified
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • News

Copyright · All Rights Reserved · RI Injury Lawyer · Contact · Attorney Slepkow on G+

Legal Notice per Rules of Professional Responsibility: The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers and attorneys in the general practice of law, but does not license or certify any lawyer / attorney as an expert or specialist in any field of practice. While this firm maintains joint responsibility, most cases of this type are referred to other attorneys for principle responsibility.

* No fees unless we win implies settlement and winning in trial cases. + The law firm of Slepkow, Slepkow and Associates Inc. was founded in 1932